HD Map Coverage Gaps: Detection and Simulation Testing

High-definition HD maps are a core component of advanced driver-assistance systems ADAS and autonomous vehicles, providing detailed road data such as lane boundaries, intersections, and traffic rules. This information helps vehicles localize accurately and make safe driving decisions.

However, HD maps are not always complete. Some areas may have missing lanes, outdated road layouts, or incomplete attributes. These coverage gaps can lead to localization errors, poor path planning, or unexpected system behavior. In real-world driving, such issues are hard to detect early and even harder to test safely.

Simulation offers a practical way to find these gaps before they cause problems on the road. It allows teams to test large areas and observe system behavior in controlled conditions. This article explains what HD map coverage gaps are and how simulation can be used to detect and test them effectively.

What are Coverage Gaps in HD Maps?

HD map coverage refers to how completely a map represents the real world. This includes roads, lanes, intersections, traffic rules, and landmarks. A coverage gap exists when any of these elements are missing, wrong, or no longer valid for a given location. To understand this clearly, it helps to separate coverage from completeness. Coverage is whether a road or area exists in the map at all. Completeness refers to how detailed and accurate the mapped area is.

Gaps can appear in two main ways:

• One common type is a spatial gap. This happens when parts of the road are not mapped at all. Examples include missing road geometry, unmapped intersections, or undefined lanes. These gaps limit the vehicle’s ability to understand where it can safely drive.

• Another category is attribute gaps. In these cases, the road exists on the map, but key details are missing. This includes lane boundaries, merge and split points, or traffic rules such as speed limits and turn restrictions. Outdated map segments also fall into this group when road layouts or signs have changed.

Moreover, coverage gaps can be local or systemic. Local gaps affect a specific location. Systemic gaps repeat across large areas. Both can cause localization errors, path-planning failures, and greater dependence on real-time sensor data, which increases risk in complex driving scenarios.

Root Causes of Coverage Gaps

Map coverage issues in HD maps are caused by a mix of technical and operational limits. For example:

• Sensor limitations and occlusions can hide lane markings, signs, or road edges during data capture.
• Time-to-map latency is another key issue. For example, a newly added turn lane or a changed intersection layout may exist on the road for weeks before it appears in the HD map.
• Rapid infrastructure updates, such as construction or temporary lanes, add further risk.
• Long-tail road scenarios are rare and hard to capture at scale.
• Regional scaling challenges make it difficult to maintain consistent quality across large map areas.

High-quality annotation and validation help improve map accuracy, but they have limits. Manual review cannot cover every road change or rare scenario in real time. This is where simulation plays a critical role. Simulation allows teams to test HD maps under many conditions, expose hidden HD map coverage gaps, and measure their impact on vehicle behavior without waiting for real-world failures.

Why Simulation is Key for HD Map Validation and Detecting Coverage Gaps

Testing HD maps on real roads has clear limits. It is expensive, time-consuming, and hard to repeat. Weather, traffic, and other environmental factors make consistent testing difficult. Rare or unsafe scenarios are often impossible to recreate on public roads.

Simulation allows teams to safely test how autonomous vehicles handle coverage gaps in HD maps. It provides a controlled environment where different road conditions and scenarios can be recreated at scale.

Controlled repeatability is another advantage. The same scenario can be run multiple times to confirm whether a failure is caused by a map gap or by other factors. This makes debugging faster and more accurate.

Simulation also bridges the gap between raw map data and live deployment. It provides a structured way to validate geometry, lane attributes, and traffic rules before vehicles encounter them. While it does not replace field testing entirely, simulation complements it by making the detection of coverage gaps faster, safer, and far more cost-effective.

Simulation Techniques for Testing Coverage

To effectively detect coverage gaps, teams rely on multiple simulation techniques. These approaches allow engineers to test maps under controlled conditions and identify weak points that may not appear in real-world testing.

Scenario-Based Simulation

Scenario-based simulation focuses on specific road situations that are known to be error-prone. Engineers create virtual roads with different layouts, traffic levels, and weather conditions. The system drives through these scenarios and reacts to the map data it receives. Engineers actively observe how the vehicle handles missing lanes, absent traffic signs, or outdated road layouts. This helps reveal weaknesses in the map that could affect real-world performance.

Stress Testing

Stress testing evaluates how much map imperfection a system can tolerate before performance degrades. Test difficulty increases step by step, with anomalies such as missing lanes, shifted road geometry, or incorrect rules introduced intentionally to observe system response thresholds.

For example, if removing one lane causes localization failure, it signals that similar real-world gaps would have a high safety impact. By measuring when and where failures occur, teams can identify which map elements are most critical and which areas need higher coverage quality.

Metrics and KPIs

Metrics and evaluation help assess coverage completeness, localization errors, and divergence between expected and actual vehicle paths. These metrics help teams compare different map versions and track improvement over time. Instead of relying on subjective observations, engineers can quantify how coverage gaps affect system behavior and prioritize fixes based on risk.

Tools and Frameworks for Simulation Testing

Several simulation platforms are commonly used to evaluate HD map coverage in controlled driving scenarios.

• CARLA is an open-source simulator that supports urban driving scenarios and detailed map testing. It allows teams to control traffic, weather, and sensor setups.
• LGSVL Simulator focuses on realistic sensor simulation and integrates well with autonomous driving stacks.
• NVIDIA Drive Sim is designed for large-scale, high-fidelity testing and supports complex road networks and advanced sensor models.

Alongside simulators, map validation and augmentation tools play an important role. Sensor fusion techniques combine data from LiDAR, cameras, radar, and GPS. This helps detect mismatches between sensor input and map data.

Automated gap detection software analyzes map layers and simulation outputs to find missing geometry, incorrect attributes, or outdated segments. Together, these tools help teams test HD maps more thoroughly before real-world deployment.

However, the effectiveness of these tools depends on the quality of the data they use. Inaccurate or incomplete map and sensor data can hide real coverage gaps or create false failures. Services like iMerit can help generate, augment, or validate simulation data, including LiDAR, semantic labels, and multi‑sensor fusion, making these simulations more robust and representative.

For example, iMerit partnered with a global Robotaxi company to improve the quality control of ground truth data used in autonomous driving systems.

The iMerit team reviewed and validated complex annotations, including 2D and 3D LiDAR semantic segmentation, cuboids, and polygons, across datasets collected from multiple cities in the US, EU, and APAC.

iMerit increased annotation accuracy from around 80% to over 95% with human-in-the-loop quality control and regular calibration. The team also improved annotation efficiency by 250%, allowing more data to be processed with the same resources.

This higher-quality data improved sensor fusion and reduced inconsistencies in simulation, helping the company detect mapping issues earlier and test autonomous behavior more reliably.

Other Approaches to Detecting HD Map Coverage Gaps

Simulation is not the only way to find coverage gaps in HD maps. Many teams also use data-driven, automated methods for map creation and validation.

Data-Driven Detection

Data-driven approaches compare real-world sensor data with expected HD map features. When the two do not align, it may indicate a gap. Common techniques include map-sensor alignment checks and ICP for matching road geometry. Graph-based lane topology validation is used to detect errors in lane structure, connections, and rules.

Automated Inspection Tools

Automated inspection tools add another layer of detection. HD map validation platforms and internal QA pipelines scan map data to flag missing or incorrect features. This includes absent lane lines, road signs, or traffic attributes. Integration with automated route planners can also reveal gaps when planned routes fail or behave unexpectedly.

Edge Case and Rare Scenario Detection

Edge case detection focuses on rare and complex situations. These include construction zones, occluded markings, or unusual road layouts. Teams use outlier detection and long-tail data analysis to surface these cases. Manual review is often triggered when models show high uncertainty or fail.

This is where high-quality annotation and domain expertise become critical. iMerit supports these approaches by delivering human-verified annotations, edge case labeling, and validation workflows that help operationalize detection methods. Rather than replacing automated systems, this human-in-the-loop approach improves precision, reduces false positives, and ensures detected gaps reflect real-world complexity.

Best Practices for Detecting and Testing in Simulation

Before running simulations, it is important to establish clear practices to ensure the tests are thorough and reliable. Following structured approaches helps uncover coverage gaps early and improves the overall quality of HD maps.

Here are the best practices for detecting and testing in simulation:

• Effective testing starts with diverse simulation data. Datasets should cover day and night driving, urban and rural roads, and different weather conditions. This helps expose gaps that appear only in specific environments.
• Simulation data must stay aligned with real-world maps. HD maps change often, so simulation coverage should be updated after each map release. This ensures tests reflect current road conditions and layouts.
• Automated map validation tools should run before simulation testing begins. These tools can flag missing geometry, incorrect attributes, or broken lane connections early. Fixing these issues upfront saves time during scenario testing.
• Human-validated edge cases are also important. Rare events like road work or unusual intersections are often missed by automation. Adding carefully annotated edge cases to simulation pipelines reduces blind spots and improves overall test quality.

Conclusion

Finding and testing HD map coverage gaps early is critical for safe autonomous driving. Undetected gaps can lead to localization errors, planning failures, and unsafe vehicle behavior. Addressing map coverage issues before deployment reduces real-world risk.

Key takeaways

• Coverage gaps in HD maps can affect localization, planning, and safety.
• HD map gaps often come from missing data, outdated maps, or rare road scenarios.
• Simulation is the most scalable way to find and test coverage gaps before deployment.
• Reliable results depend on accurate, complete, and well-validated map data.
• Human review is critical for confirming gaps and handling edge cases that automation misses.

Ready to detect coverage gaps faster and more accurately?

Test and validate your HD map data with iMerit’s expert annotation teams and simulation-ready workflows. Ensure complete and high-quality maps while reducing risk and accelerating autonomous vehicle testing.

Talk to our team about simulation-ready HD map validation!